Federal Highway Administration

Region 01 NEPA Reviewers


FHWA Survey of Transportation Agencies
Rating Processes With Resource Agencies


July 29, 2003

THE GALLUP ORGANIZATION



This document contains proprietary research, copyrighted materials and literary property of The Gallup Organization. It is for the guidance of your company's executives only and is not to be copied, quoted, published or divulged to others outside of your organization. We ask that this document be safeguarded, allowing no physical or electronic duplication, allowing no one outside your organization to view this document, and allowing no one to duplicate or change that contents in an effort to formulate an inferior product. No changes may be made to this document without the express written permission of The Gallup Organization.


Introduction

The following pages provide a summary of responses to the Gallup/FHWA Survey of Transportation Agencies. Respondents were asked to rate a recent project with a resource agency, so the data reflect the views of the transportation agencies toward those projects with resource agencies. The survey statements were generally rated on a scale which required a response from among six response categories:

5
Strongly Agree Extremely Satisfied Excellent
4
3
2
1
Strongly Disagree Extremely Dissatisfied Poor

Does Not Apply or Don't Know

The statement or dimension averages are based on a 5-point scale, with " 1 " being the lowest possible average and " 5 " being the highest average. "Does Not Apply" or "Don't Know" responses are not scored. The FHWA Resource Agency Scorecard provides feedback on how the region is doing with regards to NEPA processes as compared to the "best practice" or highest scoring region for each survey item.
Note the following term definitions :

Term Definition
Index The average top box response percentages for statements measuring each category of survey items (Relationship, Communication, Timeliness, Performance, General).
Top Box The percentage of "5" (Strongly Agree / Extremely Satisfied / Excellent) responses.
Best Practice Region The region with the highest percentage of top box responses.
Region 1 Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont
Region 2 New Jersey, New York
Region 3 Delaware, Washington D.C., Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia
Region 4 Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee
Region 5 Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Wisconsin
Region 6 Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas
Region 7 Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska
Region 8 Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming
Region 9 Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada
Region 10 Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington

Transportation Agency Scorecard


%1 - %5 and means not shown when n < 5
* Denotes more than one best practice region with multiple sample sizes

Unit : Region 01
Total N : 23
Index Region 01
Top Box(%5)
Best Practice Region
Top Box(%5)
RELATIONSHIP 32 40
COMMUNICATION 26 40
TIMELINESS 29 33
PERFORMANCE 24 37
GENERAL 26 33

Gallup FHWA Transportation Survey Items


Question Text Region 01
Top Box(%5)
Best Practice Region
Top Box(%5)
Overall satisfaction with the resource agency's performance on this project (1) 17 40

RELATIONSHIP


Question Text Region 01
Top Box(%5)
Best Practice Region
Top Box(%5)
My agency knew what was expected (6a) 39 66
The resource agency provided my agency with materials we needed (6b) 36 42
The resource agency appreciated our contribution to the process (6d) 45 55
The resource agency wanted to play an active role (6e) 27 45
My agency's opinions seemed to count (6f) 35 42
The resource agency helped to move this project forward (6g) 35 37
The resource agency made efforts to improve the process (6h) 5 28

COMMUNICATION


Question Text Region 01
Top Box(%5)
Best Practice Region
Top Box(%5)
Responded in a timely way (7b) 30 45
Invited our participation in key meetings (7c) 23 52
Kept us informed of their progress (7d) 22 25
Were open and honest with us (7e) 35 69
Were open to our suggestions or alternatives (7f) 23 40
Gave reasonable suggestions or alternatives (7g) 10 33
Gave clear explanations if they did not agree with our recommendations (7h) 19 34
Willing to compromise (7i) 14 30
Adequate participation at key meetings (7j) 43 46
Sufficient level of communication (7k) 43 46

TIMELINESS


Question Text Region 01
Top Box(%5)
Best Practice Region
Top Box(%5)
Adhered to schedules (8a) 24 38
Gave my agency enough time to accomplish tasks (8b) 35 50
Entire process took reasonable amount of time (8c) 39 39
Process could have been shortened (8d) (% 1=Strongly Disagree) 20 23


PERFORMANCE


Question Text Region 01
Top Box(%5)
Best Practice Region
Top Box(%5)
Quality of information (9a) 19 33
Completeness of information (9b) 14 38
Competence of agency staff (9c) 48 51
Ability to stay organized (9d) 27 35
Understanding my agency's requirements (9e) 26 35
Level of resources devoted (9f) 9 29
Range of reasonable alternatives suggested (9g) 6 32
Willingness to consider mitigation measures (9h) 41 44


GENERAL


Question Text Region 01
Top Box(%5)
Best Practice Region
Top Box(%5)
Understands my agency's mission (11a) 22 39
Cares about my agency's mission (11b) 17 24
Committed to doing quality work (11c) 39 56
Has competent staff (11d) 39 44
Sufficient level of trust between the two agencies (11e) 22 29
Committed to making environmental review process efficient (11f) 17 27
Willing to compromise (11g) 9 15
Sufficient level of communication between the two agencies (11h) 26 37
Committed to transportation improvements (11j) 13 29
Change in relationship over past 3 years (% 3=Improved) (12) 65 65
Overall characterization of relationship (% 5=Excellent) (13) 17 24


PROBLEMS (YES/NO)


Question Text Region 01
Top Box(%5)
Best Practice Region
Top Box(%5)
Experienced a problem (2) 22 22
Problem at early project planning/scoping (3a) 20 20
Problem at defining purpose and need (3b) n < 5 6
Problem at information/data collection (3c) n < 5 18
Problem at development/analysis of alternatives (3d) n < 5 25
Problem at analysis of impacts (3e) 40 40
Problem at selection of alternative (3f) 20 17
Problem at commitment to mitigation (3g) 60 23
Problem at finalizing documents/response to comments (3h) 40 40
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Extremely Dissatisfied...Extremely Satisfied Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
01 Overall, how satisfied were you with the agency's performance on this project? Region 01 23 0 9 17 57 17 3.83 17
Best Practice Region 52 0 6 17 37 40 4.12 6
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
06A My agency knew what was expected of it in this process. Region 01 23 0 9 22 30 39 4 39
Best Practice Region 41 0 7 10 17 66 4.41 4
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
06B The resource agency provided my agency with the materials, information, or documentation that we needed. Region 01 22 5 9 23 27 36 3.82 36
Best Practice Region 48 0 8 19 31 42 4.06 6
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
06D The resource agency wanted to play an active role Region 01 22 5 9 18 23 45 3.95 45
Best Practice Region 40 0 13 13 20 55 4.18 4
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
06E My agency's opinions counted in the permitting process. Region 01 22 0 9 27 36 27 3.82 27
Best Practice Region 33 0 6 15 33 45 4.18 5
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
06F The resource agency felt the mission of this project was important. Region 01 23 0 13 30 22 35 3.78 35
Best Practice Region 26 8 8 8 35 42 3.96 7
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
06G The resource agency helped to move this project forward. Region 01 23 0 13 26 26 35 3.83 35
Best Practice Region 51 4 6 22 31 37 3.92 6
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
06H The resource agency made efforts to improve the process. Region 01 22 5 18 50 23 5 3.05 5
Best Practice Region 47 2 13 30 28 28 3.66 6
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
07B Responded in a timely way to our requests. Region 01 23 0 9 22 39 30 3.91 30
Best Practice Region 51 4 8 25 18 45 3.92 6
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
07C Invited our participation in key meetings. Region 01 13 0 8 31 38 23 3.77 23
Best Practice Region 31 6 6 13 23 52 4.06 6
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
07D Kept us informed of their progress. Region 01 23 0 9 39 30 22 3.65 22
Best Practice Region 44 7 9 32 27 25 3.55 6
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
07E Were open and honest with us. Region 01 23 0 4 17 43 35 4.09 35
Best Practice Region 35 6 3 9 14 69 4.37 5
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
07F Were open to our suggestions or alternatives. Region 01 22 0 14 27 36 23 3.68 23
Best Practice Region 45 0 7 18 36 40 4.09 6
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
07G Gave reasonable suggestions or alternatives. Region 01 20 5 10 30 45 10 3.45 10
Best Practice Region 45 2 16 16 33 33 3.8 6
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
07H Gave clear explanations if they did not agree with our recommendations. Region 01 21 0 10 29 43 19 3.71 19
Best Practice Region 29 7 10 24 24 34 3.69 5
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
07I Willing to compromise. Region 01 21 10 14 24 38 14 3.33 14
Best Practice Region 40 3 10 33 25 30 3.7 6
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
07J Had adequate participation at key meetings. Region 01 21 5 0 14 38 43 4.14 43
Best Practice Region 28 4 14 14 21 46 3.93 5
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
07K Overall, there was a sufficient level of communication between the two agencies on this project. Region 01 23 0 9 26 22 43 4 43
Best Practice Region 52 0 4 29 21 46 4.1 6
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
08A Adhered to schedules set throughout the process. Region 01 21 5 5 19 48 24 3.81 24
Best Practice Region 39 5 3 26 28 38 3.92 8
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
08B Gave your agency enough time to accomplish tasks. Region 01 20 0 0 25 40 35 4.1 35
Best Practice Region 30 0 3 13 33 50 4.3 8
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
08C Entire process took a reasonable amount of time. Region 01 23 0 9 30 22 39 3.91 39
Best Practice Region 23 0 9 30 22 39 3.91 1
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
08D The Process could have been shortened without compromising NEPA. Region 01 20 20 25 25 15 15 2.8 20
Best Practice Region 22 23 5 9 23 41 3.55 2
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
09A Quality of information the resource agency provided to your agency. Region 01 21 0 5 29 48 19 3.81 19
Best Practice Region 48 2 4 21 40 33 3.98 6
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Poor...Excellent Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
09B Completeness of information they provided. Region 01 21 0 0 38 48 14 3.67 14
Best Practice Region 48 2 8 29 23 38 3.85 6
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Poor...Excellent Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
09C Competence of their agency staff you interacted with. Region 01 23 0 4 22 26 48 4.17 48
Best Practice Region 51 0 4 16 29 51 4.27 6
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Poor...Excellent Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
09D Ability to stay organized throughout the project. Region 01 22 0 0 32 41 27 3.95 27
Best Practice Region 51 0 10 18 37 35 3.98 6
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Poor...Excellent Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
09E Their understanding of your agency's requirements. Region 01 23 0 4 26 43 26 3.91 26
Best Practice Region 51 0 16 12 37 35 3.92 6
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Poor...Excellent Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
09F The level of resources they devoted to this project. Region 01 22 0 9 41 41 9 3.5 9
Best Practice Region 49 0 8 35 29 29 3.78 6
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Poor...Excellent Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
09G Range of reasonable alternatives they suggested for this project. Region 01 16 6 13 63 13 6 3 6
Best Practice Region 38 5 13 21 29 32 3.68 6
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Poor...Excellent Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
09H Willingness to consider a range of mitigation measures. Region 01 17 6 18 6 29 41 3.82 41
Best Practice Region 43 0 5 23 28 44 4.12 6
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
11A Understands your agency's mission. Region 01 23 0 4 35 39 22 3.78 22
Best Practice Region 41 7 7 20 27 39 3.83 4
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
11B Cares about your agency's mission. Region 01 23 4 26 17 35 17 3.35 17
Best Practice Region 37 3 24 22 27 24 3.46 4
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
11C Committed to doing quality work. Region 01 23 0 0 9 52 39 4.3 39
Best Practice Region 39 0 0 15 28 56 4.41 4
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
11D Has competent staff. Region 01 23 0 0 22 39 39 4.17 39
Best Practice Region 39 0 5 8 44 44 4.26 4
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
11E There is a sufficient level of trust between your two agencies. Region 01 23 9 13 30 26 22 3.39 22
Best Practice Region 51 2 20 25 24 29 3.59 6
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
11F Is committed to making the environmental review process efficient. Region 01 23 0 22 26 35 17 3.48 17
Best Practice Region 51 4 16 24 29 27 3.61 6
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
11G Is willing to compromise. Region 01 23 4 22 26 39 9 3.26 9
Best Practice Region 39 3 13 33 36 15 3.49 4
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
11H There is a sufficient level of communication between the two agencies. Region 01 23 0 22 0 52 26 3.83 26
Best Practice Region 41 5 10 17 32 37 3.85 4
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Strongly Disagree...Strongly Agree Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
11J Is committed to transportation improvements. Region 01 23 13 26 26 22 13 2.96 13
Best Practice Region 35 3 26 23 20 29 3.46 5
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Worse...Improved Best
Practice
Region
% Top Box
Summary
Previous
Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3
12 Over the past 3 years, has your agency's overall relationship with the resource agency improved, stayed the same, or gotten worse? Region 01 23 9 26 65 65
Best Practice Region 23 9 26 65 1
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
Poor...Excellent Mean
Score
Best
Practice
Region
%Top Box Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2 %3 %4 %5
13 How would you characterize the relationship between your agency and the resource agency? Region 01 23 4 9 26 43 17 3.61 17
Best Practice Region 41 2 2 34 37 24 3.78 4
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
YES NO Best
Practice
Region
% of Yes
Response
Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2
02 Did you experience any problems with the resource agency during this project? Region 01 23 22 78 22
Best Practice Region 23 22 78 1
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
YES NO Best
Practice
Region
% of Yes
Response
Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2
03A Problems at early project planning or scoping. Region 01 5 20 80 20
Best Practice Region * 20 80 1,7,9,10
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
YES NO Best
Practice
Region
% of Yes
Response
Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2
03B Problems at defining purpose and need. Region 01 <5
Best Practice Region 18 6 94 3
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
YES NO Best
Practice
Region
% of Yes
Response
Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2
03C Problems at information or data collection. Region 01 <5
Best Practice Region 11 18 82 2
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
YES NO Best
Practice
Region
% of Yes
Response
Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2
03D Problems at development and analysis of alternatives. Region 01 <5
Best Practice Region * 25 75 1,6
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
YES NO Best
Practice
Region
% of Yes
Response
Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2
03E Problems at analysis of impacts. Region 01 5 40 60 40
Best Practice Region 5 40 60 1
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
YES NO Best
Practice
Region
% of Yes
Response
Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2
03F Problems at selection of preferred alternatives. Region 01 5 20 80 20
Best Practice Region * 17 83 3,6
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
YES NO Best
Practice
Region
% of Yes
Response
Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2
03G Problems at commitment to mitigation measures. Region 01 5 60 40 60
Best Practice Region 13 23 77 4
Question Number Client-Specific Items Region Type Sample
Size
YES NO Best
Practice
Region
% of Yes
Response
Summary
Previous Waves
Now
%1 %2
03H Problems at finalizing documents or response to comments. Region 01 5 40 60 40
Best Practice Region 5 40 60 1